1/18/08

Looking at the Nanking "Massacre" Photographic Evidence provided by the Chinese Communist Party

Looking at the Nanking Incident through Photographic & Statistical Evidence.

Some pictures have been proven and admitted by the publishers that they were in fact fake, but still circulate as historic evidence to this day. Others have been cut off to not show the original caption or have shadows that are seasonally impossible to have happened during the time of the Nanking Incident.

Is this issue too touchy to investigate, or should all things taken as "fact" atleast be examined before being believed?


Part 1



Part 2

Part 3



6 comments:

PipMyTrade said...

there are probably bias in both countries but there are mounting evidence (once again being whitewashed by japanese media). you need to wake up son.

kal said...

i love Japaneses but i'm going to have to disagree with this one

Anonymous said...

its like saying jew holoacust never existed i enjoy all ur videos but not this one

Anonymous said...

問い

question
 日本で何故南京事件の否定派が増えたのか?
 是在日本為何南京事件的否定派增加的?
 why has the number of negative sects of
  the nanking massacre increased in japan?
 
答え
回答
answer
 多分、次の本が出版されたからであろう
 大概,下面的書被出版了吧
 it is perhaps because the following book is published.
 
 この本は國民党の機密文書に基づいている
 這個書按照國民黨的機密文件
 this book is based on the confidential document
  of the guomindang(chinese nationalist party).

===========================================================
『南京事件 "証拠写真" を検証する』
  http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/reader/4794213816/ref=sib_dp_pt/503-7152288-3875968#reader-link
 
 の英語版の抜粋
  英語版的摘錄
 
  analyzing the “photographic evidence”
    of the nanking massacre
 
   ( → http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/26_S4.pdf )
   ( → http://www.soshisha.com/book_search/detail/1_1381.html )
    參考  http://www.soshisha.com/book_search/detail/1_1488.html )
 
 
 続きは
 繼續
 next
 
  http://ryancheung.ycool.com/post.1969951.html
   charles cheung's blog
    纪念南京大屠杀七十周年

Anonymous said...

I hope you realize that denying the rape of Nanking only makes Japan look bad.

Anonymous said...

You are seeing how questioning the big reinforced lies wakes up a dubious audience. Once one big lie (Rape of Nanking) is exposed as a hoax, the rest may fall like dominoes. That makes it "dangerous" as they say.